George W. Bush, who was perhaps the most profligate Republican spender in history, had one crowning achievement in his presidency. He rolled back the unconstitutionally retroactive tax hike imposed by Bill Clinton. That tax rollback, without action by Congress, will expire this year.
President Obama has recently taken to the campaign trail to decry the unfairness of this proposed lower tax rate, since it is a well known fact that high income earners do NOT pay their fair share. (Sarcasm intentional). On this, he is in complete agreement with Clinton. Presidents Obama and Clinton never let the facts get in the way of pandering to potential voters.
That there is exists a level of inequality in income is not in dispute. But what about fairness?
The distribution of pretax income in the United States today is highly unequal. The most precise studies suggest that the top 10% of households, with average income of about $200,000, received 42% of all pretax money income in the late 1990s. The top 1% of households, averaging $800,000 of income, received 15% of all pretax money income.
Interestingly, the income inequaltiy has risen over the last several decades, which is cited by many as proof of the heartlessness of the rich, the Wall Street generation and indifferent Republicans. Ironically, entitlement spending, designed to address this inequality, has literally exploded at a parabolic rate, yet has had absolutely no impact on inequality, except to make it worse.
So, for the accusation that rich do not pay their fair share to hold water, we would expect that distribution of taxes should be less skewed with a greater burden on the poor, right?
It would seem that data from the U.S. Treasury cast cold water on this claim.
According to recent Treasury figures, the top 0.1% of taxpayers by income pay 17.4% of federal income taxes (earning 9.1% of the income), the top 1% with gross income of $328,049 or more pay 36.9% (earning 19%), the top 5% with gross income of $137,056 or more pay 57.1% (earning 33.4%), and the bottom 50% with gross income of $30,122 or less pay 3.3% (earning 13.4%).
If we examine the wealth distribution rate, the net wealth (not only income but also including real estate, cars, house, stocks, etc) distribution of the United States virtually perfectly coincides with the share of income tax – the top 1% pay 36.9% of federal tax (wealth 32.7%), the top 5% pay 57.1% (wealth 57.2%), top 10% pay 68% (wealth 69.8%), and the bottom 50% pay 3.3% (wealth 2.8%).
President Obama and Clinton love to talk about tax cuts for the middle class. If the bottom half of income earners contribute a paltry 3.3% to the total taxes received, how on Earth could they get their taxes cut? You can only cut taxes to those who actually PAY tax. Sure, it makes for a great campaign speech to those who don't know any better such as our friends in the media, but it just doesn't hold up under any scrutiny.
In a democratic society where the majority rules, what better way to buy votes than to virtually exclude half the population from taxes? Soak the rich rhetoric plays well to the liberal media, but makes no economic sense whatsoever.
I do agree with Presidents Obama and Clinton on one thing. The rich SHOULD pay their fair share. If someone would send each of them a link to this piece, I have NO DOUBT that they will acknowledge the error of their ways and immediately cut taxes for the high-income segment of the population! (Sarcasm intentional).
Marko's Take
Showing posts with label personal income taxes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label personal income taxes. Show all posts
Sunday, September 12, 2010
Monday, December 21, 2009
There IS A Law Requiring The Payment Of Federal Income Taxes, Right?
NO! In fact, no such law exists! REALLY!
America: Freedom to Fascism - Director's Authorized Version, a documentary produced by the late, great Aaron Russo, is a definitive piece on the topic. I had the honor of knowing Aaron personally in his final months of life, before he succumbed to cancer in 2007.
The information in today's blog is excerpted directly from that documentary, which you may view in its entirety merely by clicking the link above.
As early as 1894, The Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the power to tax wages was unconstitutional. However, Congress later passed the 16th ammendment in 1913 in order to impose a bona-fide income tax. At that time, President Woodrow Wilson said "I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined a nation. America is now controlled by its system of credit". By system of credit, he was referring to the accompanying establishment of the Federal Reserve.
The 16th Ammendment conferred NO new powers of taxation and was NOT ratified by the states.
Furthermore, the U.S. Constitution specifies that ANY direct tax must be "apportioned", meaning divided equally among all people. As you know, the personal income tax is NOT.
But aren't income taxes vital to provide essential services? NO!
Education is paid for by property taxes. Highways are paid for by the various taxes on gasoline. Defense was paid for by CORPORATE taxes, which are entirely legal. However, Defense expenditures have ballooned to such an extent, that even corporate taxes in their entirety are not, at this time, sufficient.
As recently as 2005, legal Corporate taxes were $278 billion, while illegal personal taxes were $927 billion.
The "controversy" continues. On August 31, 2005, Federal Judge Emmet Sullivan, ruled that the government is not even REQUIRED to answer the American people's questions as to the legality or existence of the personal tax law, despite the guarantees afforded by the FIRST Ammendment.
The IRS has refused to show ANY laws requiring payment of personal income taxes, despite a voluminous code, now the size of a rather large telephone directory!
According to Bill Clinton, while questioned about the legality of personal taxation on March 11, 1993: "We can't be fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans". WHAT???
The IRS code itself states that the personal income tax is VOLUNTARY! "Your income tax is 100% voluntary and your liquor tax is a 100% enforced tax."
The code does not even define the term "income". The Supreme Court has ruled income as constituting "gains from corporate activity". It has further ruled that employment is considered "private property" in the context of being exchanged for any form of payment (Coppage v. Kansas 1914).
NONE of any of the Supreme Court rulings have yet to be overturned!
If this doesn't give you a Christmas chuckle, then I don't know what will.
"Take me on" in the Comments section below.
Marko's Take
America: Freedom to Fascism - Director's Authorized Version, a documentary produced by the late, great Aaron Russo, is a definitive piece on the topic. I had the honor of knowing Aaron personally in his final months of life, before he succumbed to cancer in 2007.
The information in today's blog is excerpted directly from that documentary, which you may view in its entirety merely by clicking the link above.
As early as 1894, The Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the power to tax wages was unconstitutional. However, Congress later passed the 16th ammendment in 1913 in order to impose a bona-fide income tax. At that time, President Woodrow Wilson said "I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined a nation. America is now controlled by its system of credit". By system of credit, he was referring to the accompanying establishment of the Federal Reserve.
The 16th Ammendment conferred NO new powers of taxation and was NOT ratified by the states.
Furthermore, the U.S. Constitution specifies that ANY direct tax must be "apportioned", meaning divided equally among all people. As you know, the personal income tax is NOT.
But aren't income taxes vital to provide essential services? NO!
Education is paid for by property taxes. Highways are paid for by the various taxes on gasoline. Defense was paid for by CORPORATE taxes, which are entirely legal. However, Defense expenditures have ballooned to such an extent, that even corporate taxes in their entirety are not, at this time, sufficient.
As recently as 2005, legal Corporate taxes were $278 billion, while illegal personal taxes were $927 billion.
The "controversy" continues. On August 31, 2005, Federal Judge Emmet Sullivan, ruled that the government is not even REQUIRED to answer the American people's questions as to the legality or existence of the personal tax law, despite the guarantees afforded by the FIRST Ammendment.
The IRS has refused to show ANY laws requiring payment of personal income taxes, despite a voluminous code, now the size of a rather large telephone directory!
According to Bill Clinton, while questioned about the legality of personal taxation on March 11, 1993: "We can't be fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans". WHAT???
The IRS code itself states that the personal income tax is VOLUNTARY! "Your income tax is 100% voluntary and your liquor tax is a 100% enforced tax."
The code does not even define the term "income". The Supreme Court has ruled income as constituting "gains from corporate activity". It has further ruled that employment is considered "private property" in the context of being exchanged for any form of payment (Coppage v. Kansas 1914).
NONE of any of the Supreme Court rulings have yet to be overturned!
If this doesn't give you a Christmas chuckle, then I don't know what will.
"Take me on" in the Comments section below.
Marko's Take
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)